I bless you in the Name of the Father, the SON and the HOLY Spirit. Ask yourself this. Battle of the Bibles on link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNv-zzpIwBs ; and Changing the Wordon link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqBEuxGY7DI. If they were deliberately mis-copied by different groups in different locations to support certain theological doctrines, then one could expect differences between the two results, but it is simply not possible to explain how two faithful copies of an original text could end up so incompatible. Would appreciate knowing what is considered to be the oldest versions of the OT and NT. This is just not possible, for there is no mention of the catastrophe in Rome when these apostles and most of the other Christians were cruelly massacred late in Neros reign. Who knew the reliability of their manuscrips than the monks at St Caherines? A court is not the appropriate place to prove or disprove the authenticity of old manuscripts. I really enjoyed the side-by-side comparison; its clear that scribes through time have substantially modified the text. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukRCVDmiAts. textus receptus vs septuagint. Describes her perfectly. I dont this boils down to Mark in KJV vs. Sinaiticus by any means.There are more books and there are more versions of Mark. Why are u sending any time on this fraud? CB I had to laugh as I was thinking nearly the same thing when I read you post. Clearly that must have been because they were recognised from a very early date to be unreliable to the point of theological fraud. Biblical Archaeology Review is the guide on that fascinating journey. Im trying to see if there has ever been any other number than 144,000 taken in the first biblical calling mentioned in Revelations. Amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls. For example the Magna Carta (c.1200 AD) is so frail and desiccated that it is enclosed in a sealed environment, to prevent total disintegration. Perhaps one that shows there is far more unity and consistency in early Christian theology than disunity and change, as this article suggests? I am still looking into this. Ive known for a long time these differences existed, I just have never been able to figure out how these differences came to be. These two facts should be enough to get your mind thinking whether you have made a right judgement in your comment proving anything Godly about Christianity is bogus Ronald S. Hendel of the University of California, Berkeley, argues that scholars can reconstruct a more original Hebrew Bible text if they " combine the best from each tradition .". A million is a million, not one less than a million. Since then, many editions of the Greek New Testament have been published. Thanks in advance. Corrupt Path - The ' Minority Text' consists of only 5% of existing manuscripts . And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. My goodness it appears that the Word of God inerrant, unchanging has many versions, and that these versions do not agree with each other. Washingtonicus and one of its principle claims to fame is its particular addition to the last chapter. That is in the Sinaiticus, but not in any manuscripts prior to the Council of Nicea. The codex sin was proven to be a fraudulent in court. He is either Lord, liar, or lunatic. To answer your questions in order, 1) The source of the text underlying most English translations today would be some combination of Greek texts as produced from primarily the Codex Sinaiticus and the Codex Vaticanus Manuscripts by Nestle/Aland or United Bible Societies. In it we are given this assurance: The green grass dries up, the blossom withers, but the word of our God endures forever. (Isaiah 40:8; 1 Peter 1:25) The version known as the Peshitta plays a humble but important role in the accurate transmission of the Bibles message to all of humanity For obvious reasons, the Textus Receptus is also referred to as the "Majority Text" since the majority (95% or more) of existing manuscripts support this reading. -Thus proving anything Godly about Christianity is bogus. What I think is significant is that the basic message of the bible hasnt changed regardless of which Greek manuscript is used for translation into English. The New Testament still stands alone as the best attested ancient document, period. This later kind of division is an unfortunate tragedy, because Christians are not following Scripture that teaches love, peace, and unity amongst the believers. Mark 1.41 MISTAKE. Therefore human sinful behavior cannot be pinned on a failing of Scripture itself. According to James Bentley, Tischendorf was not troubled by the omission of the resurrection in Mark because he believed that Matthew was written first and that Marks gospel was an abridged version of Matthews gospel. Photo: Courtesy of St. Catherines Monastery. After all this education I have decided to always demand the KJV Only. And we have very good reason, from Pauls letters, most of which are accepted as authentic even by non-Christian scholars, that the earliest disciples believed that they had seen the risen Jesus on multiple independent occasions and were willing to die for that belief. The case of using the Dead Sea Scrolls to modify the Masoretic text is no different. Thank you. Neither the original hand nor any corrector afterward in Codex Sinaiticus has the wording that Jesus was angry in Mark 1:41. My question about, neither the son is there They knew this. Versions of the bible that are forever under scrutiny?. All ready for the next generation of innocent and naive seekers for truth. It appears in the Greek Codex Alexandrinus of the fifth century, the Latin Vulgate, and elsewhere. One such scholar is Jason David BeDuhn, associate professor of religious studies at Northern Arizona University in the United States. Take as an example the so-called long conclusion of the Gospel of Mark, which in some Bibles follows Mark 16:8. Everyones complaining yet the letter, sent from Juda to his apostles, in jerusalem warning of people corrupting the words of jesus clearly names jesus as a servant of god rather than the son of god if they were gods first companions why didnt they state so i mean jesus should have told them at from the beginning quite EXPLICITLY! All religions are based on truth claims. And then when I read a modern version of the Bible (derived from the Westcott and Hort revisions) I never experience this power or anything like it at all??? Codex Sinaiticus was discovered by Constantin von Tischendorf, a German evolutionist theologian, at St. Catherine's Monastery at Mount Sinai. Why dont you ask GOD for the understanding. 95% of all NT Manuscripts agree, yet modern scholars reject the testimony of the Received text underlying the KJV English translation in favor of something that was discarded asking us to believe that the True Words of God were lost for hundreds of years making God a liar in His Promise of Preservation. In fact, a Syrian Bishop named Theodoret (397-457 AD) found 200 copies of it in his church and threw them out. Where can we find proof of the existence of God? People will accept critical change if it appears in small and harmless doses. delivered over to death, that they may return to the truth and sin I went to a lecture give by Dr Cooper on this subject, and his evidence and the surprised response of the British Library staff at the youthful condition of the manuscripts, was very compelling. Two men who did not believe the scriptures were inerrant, who conducted seances, who did not believe in the miracles of Christ and who were enamored of Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution. Besides, thats what he tells us to do, ask. The main texts, Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, contradict each other over 3,000 times in the gospels alone, and they disagree with the ' Majority Text' in 13,000 places. Sinaiticus contains the Epistle of Barnabas and a part of the Shepherd of Hermas, which don't belong to New Testament's texts. Such a production line was slow and laborious and costly. When someone spoke the passage ended when the speaker finished. Woe to the Textus Receptus supporters. Those Jewish leaders I dare say would have been far more familiar with the OT than you or I have ever been. Combine a one-year tablet and print subscription to BAR with membership in the BAS Library to start your journey into the ancient past today! 2. I didnt want to put it with other translations on my bookshelves lest someone read it unawares and was led astray, but I did not feel comfortable destroying it so I hid it. Access to 50+ curated Special Collections. Its as if phrases were added with reckless abandon. -> Proverbs 8:22 The Lord possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old. How else could it be that no copies of these manuscripts, not even on small fragments, have been discovered? I concur. I have a theory its actually 144 million or 1.44 billion. Codex Sinaiticus says that Jesus was moved with compassion in Mark 1:41. Set it in stone rag. Those wanting to use the Greek manuscripts needs to consult the fact that these were Yisraelis writing, not Greek and the language would have been written in Hebrew. you dont have to be a christian or a jew to be a good translator. May a non-Christian, nonJewish reader of no particular faith point out that you would seem a much greater tribute to your respective Catholic and Protestant faiths were you to behave with more charity to each other and, with good will, attempt to dissipate all odium theologicum, replacing it with a more expansive spirit of brotherly/sisterly love and respect? And now there are Christians in every country on earth just as Jesus commanded his disciples to do. UNHOLY HANDS ON THE BIBLE, BURGON, GREEN, SOVEREIGN GRAC PUB. If I misquote the Prime minister of my country just by a little bit, publicly, and insist that my quote is what he said, even when it is pointed out that I got it wrong, will I be excused by the Chief Prosecutor for the Government? And Christ replied to them, But the very reason why the Jewish religious left (or right) charged Jesus with blaasphemy and wanted Hm dead was because thy understood perfectly that Jesus was stating that He was equal with God the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, etc. https://www.faraboveall.com/015_Textual/SPLIT%20TEXTS_JETS_current.pdf. The Sinaitic Syriac does not have this long conclusion either, adding further evidence that the long conclusion is a later addition and was not originally part of Marks Gospel. Below, see a visual comparison of these and other differences between the King James Version and Codex Sinaiticus. Thanks. Why not do an article as well featuring Whats included in Codex Sinaiticus which includes Jesus exalted position in Revelation, being referenced as the Son of God in many other parts of the gospels, the fact that Mark leaves with someone announcing Jesus resurrection, the fact that all 4 gospels and Pauls letters are there (all of which clearly spell out Jesus deity and identity as Risen Lord)and all of this from the 4th centuryand when compared to other manuscripts and documents from early church fathers, the Codex Sinaiticus only further confirms that early Christians viewed Jesus as God? The Textus Receptus is the text which the King James translators used. If Satan can place doubt about the word of God in mans head, he has the war half won It is by faith and faith alone we can be saved I have personally been transformed from a drunkard, dope head, and whoremonger, into a son of God by faith and our so called flawed KJV. COPYRIGHT 2023 BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY SOCIETY 5614 Connecticut Ave NW #343, Washington DC 20015-2604. further reading AN INTRODUCTION TO TEXTUAL CRITICISM VOL 1. And We sent Noah and Abraham, and established in their descendants prophecy and the Book: and some of them are rightly guided, but many are rebellious. In addition, I dont think Id ever forget them, because theyre life changing. This Bible History Daily feature was originally published on August 12, 2015. Im new to this discussion. 1209), designated by siglum B or 03 (in the Gregory-Aland numbering), 1 ( von Soden ), is a fourth-century Christian manuscript of a Greek Bible, containing the majority of the Greek Old Testament and the majority of the Greek New Testament. However, the two authoritative fourth-century Greek manuscriptsCodex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanusboth end with Mark 16:8. No one said they were quoteing Joe but passing on what they remembered. They had Jesus , no need even if they could have, to commit what was being said to memory. The Vaticanus and Sinaiticus manuscripts are part of this group. Codex Sinaiticus (A) Codex Sinaiticus discovered from the Monastery of Saint Catherine at Sinai 1844. This is also the text that agrees with more than 95% of the Bible Manuscripts in Koine (common) Greek. 8 years of Archaeology Odyssey online, exploring the ancient roots of the Western world in a scholarly and entertaining way, The New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land. When you allow biased comments like this: Let me point out that the oldest Bible on display in the United States is the Codex Is it not because of these negatives that the world is so rotten as it is? Matthew 24/37 are you sure and how sure you are? Through this codex, the R.V. However, in 1881 scholars Westcott and Hort published a new Greek New Testament text that included the findings of Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus. You are applying 20th century, literate society ideas on a first century oral transmission society. God has become a stigma in our society today, the lack of morality I think is a reflection of that stigma. Amen ! Just like the serpent was doing the devils dirty work in the Garden of Eden where God walked and talked with our first parents, (and conquered for a time), so too the devil has had his agents working to subvert and pervert Scripturelittle by little, line by line, here a little there a little over many centuries. Take a look at these two English translations. Strange where you find some of BC assertions of the immortality of the soul. The woman caught in adultery from John 8 is omitted in Codex Sinaiticus. Go read the 18th chapter. The Sinaitic Syriac is considered one of the most important Biblical manuscripts discovered, right along with such Greek manuscripts as the Codex Sinaiticus and the Codex Vaticanus. And how about the epistle of Barnabas and the Shepherd of Hermas? This debate has been going on for centuries and likely there will always be disagreements as to which is closer to the original Greek autographs. Being the oldest and best makes Rome correct in their belief. That is, assuming they existed.. That leaves only Matthew 28:19 to support the doctrine of the Trinity. Codex Vaticanus, gathering dust in the Vatican library since the 1500s and Codex Sinaiticus, rescued from a trash can in St. Catherines monasteryused by Westcott and Hort to rewrite the KJV. Textus Receptus is Latin for "Received Text." It was used as the textual base for the vernacular translations that arose during the Reformation period. Constantine Tischendorf was a false teacher, like one of the ones Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Messiah, warned about. Scripture testifies to that truth time and again. Modern scholarship generally holds that Mark is in fact the oldest of the Synoptic Gospels, which could cause theological concerns over the omitted resurrection. check out this documentary by Abduhla Films called Bridge To Babylon The KJV is familiar to most of us so naturally we prefer the familiar, but to place it on par with the original Greek manuscripts of the bible seems sacrilegious. Handwritten well over 1600 years ago, the manuscript contains the Christian Bible in Greek, including the oldest complete copy of the New Testament. I am still researching this. there is evidence of textual tampering, attempts at artificially aging the manuscript, and alleged bookworm tracks that start in the middle of the page. I will always prefer the KJV with all its faults. Revelation and discernment of all things spiritual are given to those who seek with all of their heart, mind and soul. Scholars in favor of the critical text of the bible, view the Codex Sinaiticus to be one of the greatest Greek texts of the New Testament and the codex is a celebrated historical treasure by many modern scholars, along with that of the Codex Vaticanus. 4 I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; 2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.

Sic Cargo Pilot Jobs Near Texas, What Disqualifies You From Owning A Gun In Pennsylvania, Articles T